'PHNAT' Tagged

The photographer not a terrorist: the British police are now able to

2011th September 20 Tuesday
LondonPolice knows phnat A fotós nem terrorista: az angol rendőrök már tudják

The police already know ...

Serious professional protests, demonstrations and some other legal action after it looks like that in England at least the police are aware that It should take pictures in public places.

Bela Szandelszky, the AP news agency photo journalist in Hungary drew my attention to this kind of documentary Web video, which PetaPixel and DPreview also mentioned. You're right, I think it may be interesting for you too. Even more so, that I have repeatedly dealt with the situation in British photography , and also by Hungary what the rules of photography in public places .

LondonSecurity phnat photo A fotós nem terrorista: az angol rendőrök már tudják

Biztnsági ... the guards do not know

The London Street Photography Festival is a project within the framework of six photographers who shoot went (accompanied by a cameraman) in six different locations in the City of London, the city's business district. The unusual social experiment was designed to present as fact to face outstanding photographers in the city.
Each of the six sites soon appeared in the security service at one or more members, to ask the photographer to leave the business. Some security guards - obviously not motivated by his own idea - I also tried to bar the photographer photograph the building, while others are just a few steps away from the area of ​​private and public land in the distance between the arguing.
In three cases, the police called out, who politely talked to the photographers and konstatálták to terrorist threats and other security risks does not mean, of course, have the right to photograph public places, which the eager ones crossing the border security have been informed.

IFRAME Embed for Youtube

White House photographer distracted the Secret Service

2010th December 4 Saturday
Mannie Garcia WH image Fehér Házi fotóst zaklatott a Titkos Szolgálat

Photo by Mannie Garcia

Many other outdoor photographer harassment case after the U.S. White House is now a photographer working in the troubled Secret Service not to photograph the building.

Like PDNpulse reported that , at an accredited White House correspondent, Mannie Garcia wanted the building to create some pictures when the Secret Service (they are carried out by the President and the White House to protect) a uniformed man in it with, and called to delete the pictures .
Garcia's words: "He came up to me, grabbed my camera, while for hand held the gun and told me to give a picture there, and I said I was not."

The picture shows two women, as a baby stroller being pushed by the White House fence in front of overreacting to the situation and guard the right side looks into the camera.
Garcia was a photographer with his colleagues in the White House , who is World AIDS Day and other political events they reported. The photographer clearly see that the guard should have been hanging around his neck is the official shooting permit. The still insisted to delete the image, despite the fact that photographers can not be photographed him.

In the 50 years of going freelance photographers managed to delete the image - and more serious atrocities - without leaving the site, once questioned, that is under arrest or not.
Garcia understanding: "The guards were trained in public, just do not have enough experience to deal with such situations. But people have a right to be there and should not be right, even if the weapon fogdosva utasítgatnia anyone. "

His colleague, Jay Mallia less sympathetic to the situation in Darfur. blog of the U.S. Constitution on freedom of expression changes as a bastion of the White House is now known before the pedestrian street. Traditionally, acts to show the American people, if disapproval want to express something. The day in question was more a demonstration area, which could reasonably have foreseen that name if you do not bother to work - even licensed - responsible journalists.
Mallia blog about the story also shows that the guards refused to identify himself during the proceedings, and that later Mallia told the story of the Secret Service driver. The supervisor stated that the man has exceeded its powers, and confirmed that the police (and the Secret Service) has no business to speak out what each camera as the image does not delete paracsolhatják, and that this new element of their training.

Mallia also élcelődik this blog for a while, adding that in his opinion, this approach can be traced szólásszabadságból already in the U.S. Privacy Rights Act of 1791 since its adoption, there should not be regarded as a very new.
Mallia also adds to the story in a most surprising that this is the Secret Service was, who are always professionally in their work and that day is worrying without watched as protesters in a coffin was brought to the White House.

Nothing is true of Kuwait ban photographers!

2010th November 28 Sunday
LoveKuwait boulangerIE flickr Semmi sem igaz a kuvaiti fotós tilalomból!

Photo: boulanger.ie / Flickr

The original publisher's tévhírt Kuwait Times reported rectification. Negligent apologize for their work, and why did the year Estonia had their readers - and the whole world, except for a few skeptics , including me.
Perhaps for this reason you can not just Kuwait, but I thought boulanger.IE image can be a good illustration

The news spread like wildfire based on (or rather unfounded) service provider, then the page itself was not information. As the Internet rapidly growing culture, fashion, quickly described what they heard and published. Up to then the next day (well, they lasted a week) published a notice that not true, I wrote yesterday.

In fact, the page is just not made that much. The original Article inserted in front of a section of the website to take place in the story - if you take someone to visszatévedne. A separate article is not intended to turn the world tévedésüknek swollen size. In perhaps diverting too much attention to the little fact that the sheet is discredited information in his criticism of all, suspicion, or after going without. Maybe it's not a coincidence that the news has spread at certain page to a friend kommentelők responded to the Kuwait Times, not exactly the most reliable news source. Well now everyone is probably be considered to be the case but it is still sad.
When news of that mistake will get to all those who have done years were Estonia, and of course they have not checked their sources ? They do not care. And those who have been reported with great enthusiasm stupidity? Whether they would be interested? Of course not.
We reached the point that as many lendülettetl taken based on the division of money, and other sületlenségekről on " continue to send letters , "the same speed can be expanded in the press of false news.

I have many colleagues in the press are also argued that "but there you appeared, and there too," "I read somewhere" or even my favorite, that "the Internet is full of it."
Yes, in many places appeared as the fact that Bill Gates distribute his wealth among those who küldözgetik this news. Or that it is delivered to all the money they Leveler . What other intentional hoaxokról , or even by accident spread at the age of twenty ten-year Hubble teleszkópról not even talk about. That will not make something true that in many places. Especially if they are treated the same way that information, who would then go to the veracity of things.

No one ever really thought of it anywhere in the worldwide network of Internet news machine section, if a single source of news is, it can also be false? But any journalist elementary school curriculum. Anyone besides me not formulated a question that if there is a law, which, moreover, a rather dubious way to control something that the majority should not be regulated, at least then you should go to the exact rule? Instead, everyone started to produce theories - it is something to write abstracts of news content to be published next to the title - that is why the law was introduced to what is covered and what is not, or how to bypass the effect. All this without anyone even attempted to find out what the law is that you are trying to interpret.

No, it was made ​​without thinking about all the nonsense, criticism is not to be quiet as to the Amateur Photographer exception. Of course, now that turned out to be a scam, you can then refine the positions, that "what I guessed but," and that "no matter which appears to be true or false." It really does not matter? You can tell what news, if it does not matter whether the truth of those?

As formulated Online Photographer : So much for the validity of the information on the web. This page was about to begin to reason with him, it is no coincidence that the BBC and the NY Times did not bring down the tomfoolery, referring to the traditional media traditional principle that we follow the news, not just repeating what you hear from others, like the parrot or gossipy janitor .
But a quick comment in the author's head also read that this news is certainly the most prestigious press has jumped on. Although the BBC and the New York Times, maybe not really brought down the news, which otherwise is much scolded MTI not (to protect the domestic industry's honor), but the Guardian , the Telegraph , the Los Angeles Times , the Wall Street Journal One blog, and the Hungarian Origo also took for granted.

Photography ban in Kuwait - true or hoax?

2010th November 25 Thursday
 Fotózási tilalom Kuvaitban   igaz vagy átverés?

Kuwait amateur eye view fotózva Photo: SnapR / Flickr

The Kuwaiti authorities had banned the public use of SLR cameras. Intent can be shown to journalists in November, the country's streets and shopping centers such machines to photograph. (A week later, the Kuwait Times reported that it has refuted the news fénkyépezőgép prohibition. More )

It is likely that the image here ( SnapR image from Flickr ) would be able to not be ready. The news before many people are perplexed, infuriate many people. Many people report this, so I think the story is more interesting background, I tend to concentrate on this.

The news source
The typical single source, according to some not very reliable Kuwait Time proceed traceable news spread like wildfire on the Internet. The indignant bloggers and the major Western-oriented pages ( Guardian , Gizmodo , Thinq , PetaPixel ) line can be taken over by another and the common source of news, you can talk of Chase Jarvis' blog.
Today is superficial (two sentences) served with the Spottr , slightly more than this to Pixinfo also dealt with the news of the Prim.hu even produced their own ideology to be, what motivated the creation of law létezésű unproven. The great Hungarian news websites is only one of the Origo wrote the story of an English page, and can also be an indication that the MTI has not put off anything.

Uncertain background
I read quite a few places along the news is not new information that no one had read the news. The photo is from page only so many "professional" performance ran, wondering chances to engage in assumptions. Some states that the prohibition only DSLR on the subject and looking exactly the same way, but it is not possible with digital SLR photography. And that is very similar, but mirror-less machines are the exception from the scope of the law. There are papers that jokingly suggests that Kuwait will soon want to report 4/3-os camera production, and therefore prohibits the streets of the competition.
The Guardian is meant to add sztorrihoz, often referred to an attorney, on Monday the arrest of bloggers, and the press freedom organization Reporters Without Borders ranked mentions in the press referring to the work of governing. Apparently, however, the contents of the law in question, or even existence they were not followed. The press freedom organization referenced website , however, interestingly, so far does not even mention the new law - it is true that the news does not even try to scroll a barrier in front of the press work.

Ratification - missing
It seems that no one really went after the story is a fundamental principle of professional and credible foundation for double-checking sources ). Only one card is found, without a doubt that the rumor is spreading rather than trying to get extra information. Only Amateur Photographer raises that maybe it would be worthwhile to learn the exact text. Unfortunately, in attempting to do so has not been successful. However, among the different pages and Comments of the increasing number of references to the hoax story (ie duck, scam, scam, hoax) can be.

What is certain
The Kuwait Times as a fact pointed out that such a law was born, but everyone was referring to distribute them. The Amateur Photographer trying to get confirmation from the relevant official bodies, as I was by the Hungarian Foreign bodies, but so far there is no formal feedback on the matter. The British Foreign Office spokeswoman for the time being you said the page to find out the news and the British authorities in the Middle East countries, travelers tanálcsai not yet been changed to photography on: "No government, military, and industrial photography, particularly olajmezőké."

The Hungarian Press Külügyminisztérum Department was unable to provide information on the substantive matter, the new rules they can not, but they can not refute. The Hungarian Embassy in Kuwait and the Kuwaiti embassy in Budapest, did not respond to a request. The website of the Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kuwait in the following tips for travelers: "One peculiarity is that a lot of inconvenience may arise from the kamerázásból, fényképezésből. This is primarily religious, and secondly security reasons. It is useful to the minimum necessary to limit such activity, and each time before shooting to make sure you ask the question (in the picture you want to include) the person / s, and the authorities for permission. "

Addendum: One week after the initial communication of news in the Kuwait Times published a rectification, which declare that the information were not followed properly, and so false news reported. Kuwait does not have any new statutory limitations on the camera haszálatra. So far, of course, still remain valid. Read more about it Nothing is true of Kuwait ban photographers .

Not only are harassed, you can be penalized for photographers

2010th July 14 Wednesday

Mexico gulf oil spill boom Georgianne Nienaber Nem csak zaklatják, már büntetik is a fotósokat

Photo: Georgianna Nienaber

As evidenced by the recently reported PDN , another provision would prevent a lot of photos, this time aggravating the penalty item. So far, more towards ( especially in the U.S. and England ) it was the custom in the official media to harass the public domain photos applicants. Now, a new provision is to punish them will be possible. It is true that this provision expressly olajszennyezett Gulf of Mexico areas of concerns, and general, not just apply to photography.

The U.S. Coast Guard , the new provision under 40 thousand dollars can be fined up to those of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in the area where photos are used. 20-meter distance, the provision requires the maintenance of the Gulf oil spill at bay long protection devices. The regulation specifically, put it, "the vehicles are prohibited to approach within 20 meters of the oil spill removal and related work tools."

A photographer named Georgianna Nienaber claimed in his blog that the government in an attempt to prevent the immense environmental pollution, damage to the protective devices, and the oil fulldokló Birds stay tuned.
The Coast Guard said in a statement the decision of the emergency response personnel and means of disrupting trade. The media's response to violent protests by the Joint Staff, said that the 20-meter distance limitation is not much that can interfere with the work of the press and, if requested and necessary due to the part of the press, the reporters before the opening of the exclusion zones.

The American photographers but did not satisfy the formal notice, remains in the press and freedom of speech restrictions they feel behind it. Especially since other unpleasant conditions strengthen aversion.
The MSNBC in turn meant that a photo reporter in Texas, a former BP employee Rosenfieldet Lance was followed by two police cars will be arrested when a BP refinery photographed in a public area located off the road. The police threatened that if the record does not show, will be returned to the station.

BP will release claims together with pictures of the photographer released after the BP agents also featuring anti-terror task force examined whether the images are not a threat to public safety.
The photographer using the editor in chief of ProPublica, said the matter: "We respect that the country's refineries to ensure safety. However outrageous the BP process, especially since they knew that confine us to the question on our material deadline, finomítóról. Furthermore, it is no reason we can not see that if the authority may be facing the unpublished photos, why should this one involving a private company's employees do. "